Artificially Intelligent

My name is Harrison. I'm 17 years old. I'll sometimes post my random thoughts or rants, but I mainly post pictures that I like and have stumbled across. I love anime and gaming. I also really enjoy most types of music, math, and science.

infoneer-pulse:

New Algorithm Captures What Pleases the Human Ear—and May Replace Human Instrument Tuners

As computer hardware and software becomes ever more powerful, they find ways to match and then exceed many human abilities. One point of superiority that humans have stubbornly refused to yield is tuning musical instruments. Pythagoras identified the precise, mathematical relationships between musical tones over 2,000 years ago, and modern machines can beat out any human when it comes to precise math. So why aren’t computers better than people? The professional tuner does have one incontrovertible advantage: a trained human ear.
Imprecision, it turns out, is embedded in our scales, instruments, and tuning system, so pros have to adjust each instrument by ear to make it sound its best. Electronic tuners can’t do this well because there has been no known way to calculate it. Basically, it’s an art, not a science. But now, a new algorithm published in arXiv claims to be just as good as a professional tuner.

» via Discover View high resolution

infoneer-pulse:

New Algorithm Captures What Pleases the Human Ear—and May Replace Human Instrument Tuners

As computer hardware and software becomes ever more powerful, they find ways to match and then exceed many human abilities. One point of superiority that humans have stubbornly refused to yield is tuning musical instruments. Pythagoras identified the precise, mathematical relationships between musical tones over 2,000 years ago, and modern machines can beat out any human when it comes to precise math. So why aren’t computers better than people? The professional tuner does have one incontrovertible advantage: a trained human ear.

Imprecision, it turns out, is embedded in our scales, instruments, and tuning system, so pros have to adjust each instrument by ear to make it sound its best. Electronic tuners can’t do this well because there has been no known way to calculate it. Basically, it’s an art, not a science. But now, a new algorithm published in arXiv claims to be just as good as a professional tuner.

» via Discover

  1. perihelionblog reblogged this from infoneer-pulse
  2. brokendualiity reblogged this from infoneer-pulse
  3. derosnec reblogged this from sociopoliticaldribble
  4. bushidotumbles reblogged this from infoneer-pulse
  5. scienceandbitches reblogged this from infoneer-pulse
  6. constablegeneva reblogged this from ahandsomestark
  7. manoo reblogged this from kv96ic28
  8. katiehome07 reblogged this from infoneer-pulse
  9. noelanthony reblogged this from infoneer-pulse
  10. stevok reblogged this from ambitrek and added:
    Very interesting! I’ll have to remember that the next time I mess with the tuner on a synth that doesn’t sound right.
  11. ambitrek reblogged this from grooveconnection
  12. musicalixir reblogged this from jotmatt and added:
    New Algorithm Captures What Pleases the Human Ear—and May Replace Human Instrument Tuners
  13. affectionarchive reblogged this from infoneer-pulse
  14. jotmatt reblogged this from infoneer-pulse
  15. mindwideweb reblogged this from infoneer-pulse and added:
    New Algorithm Captures What Pleases the Human Ear—and May Replace Human Instrument Tuners
  16. violetbambi reblogged this from hcdragon
  17. thenineofcups reblogged this from infoneer-pulse
  18. 1330oak1995 reblogged this from infoneer-pulse
  19. kzim148 reblogged this from infoneer-pulse
  20. antier reblogged this from infoneer-pulse
  21. twiitchkicks reblogged this from infoneer-pulse
  22. australblackbird reblogged this from infoneer-pulse
  23. youshouldprobablygooutside reblogged this from infoneer-pulse
  24. atomicyawn reblogged this from infoneer-pulse
  25. whoa-someone-actually reblogged this from infoneer-pulse

Ultralite Powered by Tumblr | Designed by:Doinwork